Gardasil Death & Brain Damage: A National Tragedy

by Barbara Loe Fisher

The tragic story of Gardasil vaccine is one that is playing out real time in the homes of trusting parents, who thought they were doing the right thing to try to make their daughters "one less," and in the 21st century cyberspace forum of public opinion as well as on television. On Feb. 6, CBS-TV Evening News released NVIC's new report on Gardasil vaccine risks. (watch VIDEO here)

Today, NVIC launched a petition and issued a national press release calling on President Barack Obama, his Administration and Congress to investigate the fast track licensure and universal use recommendation of Gardasil in 2006 and the dismissal of more than 10,000 reports of Gardasil-related reactions, injuries and deaths to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) as a "coincidence" by federal health officials.

NVIC's latest Gardasil risk report comparing the number and severity of adverse events reported to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) through November 30, 2008, reveals that death and serious health problems such as stroke, blood clots, cardiac arrest, seizures, fainting, lupus and rechallenge cases are reported three to 30 times more frequently after Gardasil vaccination than after meningococcal (Menactra) vaccination. If the deaths and serious injuries being reported after Gardasil were only a "coincidence," there would be little or no difference between the frequency and severity of vaccine-related adverse events between two vaccines if the vaccines were equally reactive and the number of doses were roughly the same.

Gardasil and Menactra vaccines were licensed within a year of each other and recommended by the CDC for universal use in 11-12 year olds. Although Menactra is given to boys and girls and has already been mandated in many states for high school and college entry, Gardasil is only given to girls and is not yet mandated. Menatra is given as one-dose series and, by February 25, 2008, the CDC reported that about 15.5 million doses of Menactra had been distributed in the U.S. Gardasil is given in a three dose series and the CDC reported that, by July 2008, about 16 million doses had been distributed in the U.S.

This means that about 15 million doses of Menactra were given to about 15 million boys and/or girls and about 16 million doses of Gardasil - if every girl got three doses - were given to about five million girls. It is individuals - not doses of vaccine - who collapse, convulse, become paralyzed, have heart attacks, develop lupus and other chronic health problems after being vaccinated. The fact that death and serious health problems are reported 3 to 30 times more frequently after Gardasil than after Menactra is highly significant and it is irresponsible for federal health officials and Merck to blow it off as unimportant.

What is sad is that the average junior high or high school student could do this VAERS analysis and come to the same conclusion. It does not take an M.D., Ph.D. or math genius to figure it out. In the hours before the CBS News report was broadcast, the best answer that Merck could come up with to address the differences between adverse events associated with Gardasil and Menactra was this:

"It's important to remember that the proven benefit of GARDASIL is that it helps prevent cervical cancer caused by the two virus types responsible for most cases of cervical cancer. Nothing is more important to Merck than the safety of our products and we carefully monitor the safety of GARDASIL on a routine basis. Experts at the FDA and CDC also continue to review data and, as recently as four months ago, said "GARDASIL continues to be safe and effective, and its benefits continue to outweigh its risks." NVIC is not a medical organization and has a long history of raising concerns about vaccines that are in direct conflict with the opinion of leading medical experts. We encourage consumers to get reliable information about the safety of vaccines from www.cdc.gov."

No, it doesn't take a doctor, health official or "medical organization" to do the math. What it takes is caring about every life - whether that life represents a baby, toddler, child, teenager, young adult, adult or senior citizen - because every life is important and nobody deserves to be written off by a drug company or government agency as an expendable casualty of public health policy.

Gabrielle, the 15 year old gymnast, honor roll student and cheerleader from Wichita, Kansas, who talks about how her health has been destroyed by Gardasil vaccine in the CBS report and in the NVIC video press release, spends most of her time at home or at doctors' offices now. A few weeks ago, her school voted her Homecoming Princess. On Saturday, she tried to go to the Homecoming dance. As she was getting dressed, she collapsed with seizures and severe abdominal pain. The medication she has been taking to try to control the seizures she developed after Gardasil vaccination caused her to develop kidney stones. She was rushed to the emergency room and hospitalized.

In the past 27 years, the stories of death and brain damage that have been reported to the National Vaccine Information Center have never changed. Whether the vaccine victims are 15 months old or 15 years old, the stories are the same: a trusting parent took a bright, healthy child to a doctor for a routine vaccination and the child was never the same again.

Gardasil vaccine was inappropriately fast tracked and licensed by the FDA and recommended by the CDC with too little attention paid to the reports of brain and immune system dysfunction that developed after vaccination in pre-licensure clinical trials. That same cavalier attitude toward Gardasil-related deaths and serious health problems, which have been experienced by many girls and young women after licensure, is inexcusable.

Americans are losing trust in pharmaceutical companies making drugs and vaccines and in federal health agencies, whose responsibility is to ensure that drugs and vaccines licensed for public use are safe, effective and necessary. If those responsible for protecting our health are not going to step up to the plate and do their jobs, then it is up to the people to do it.

At www.NVIC.org you can sign the Investigate Gardasil Vaccine Risks Now! petition, read NVIC's new report on Gardasil risks, and check out our new website that makes it easier to navigate and find information to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths.

In 2009, I have a sense of déjà vu, as the story of Gardasil vaccine plays out real time. There are striking parallels between how those operating the mass vaccination system reacted in the 1980's to persistent reports that DPT vaccine was harming more children than originally assumed and the way they are reacting now to persistent reports that Gardasil is more reactive than it was originally assumed. Assumption of safety is no substitute for proof of safety. And turning away from human suffering in order to protect the status quo is not the way to run a government that needs the trust and support of the people.

In the 18th century, Queen Marie Antoinette looked down at a starving people pleading for bread to stay alive and said "Let them eat cake." It is time for everyone in government, industry and medicine to take a different approach to persistent reports of vaccine injuries and deaths or risk metaphorically suffering the same fate that ended the monarchy in France. In the 21st century, today's peasants don't have pitchforks - they have laptops, desktops, smartphones and the internet.

31 comments:

John H said...

Do you understand why I am so ticked off Barbara.

What more do these 'well meaning' people need as proof that vaccines are a fraud.

It's really worse than a fraud.

You watch this CBS News clip and it's obvious beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Gardasil vaccine is not only causing these massive open sore reactions in THOUSANDS of girls / women but, as the video clearly shows, is causing death right after the shot. The government and MERCK says "NO IT ISN'T! just shut up and take it!"

Your read the comments on the CBS message board and one after another is a horror story, and again the governments says... "ISN'T TRUE" like a bully on the playground.

What is truly sad is how these people were duped by their TV's and print ads into taking this KILLER vaccine. I took issue with the TV show 'THE DOCTORS'. This TV show was PIMPING Gardasil WITHOUT ONCE stating the deaths and maiming it had caused in it's OWN STUDIES. The producers of that show should be sued.

Last, I just want to say that we only know of the immediate problems of the vaccine that government and industry are flat out lying about. Questions yet to be answered are... Will this vaccine cause long term illness and even cancers when all is said and done? I would pretty much count on it.

Were the benefits worth the risks? Give me a break!

The reality is even worse than this CBS clip is 'WHITEWASHING'.

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4781857n

Stem Cell for Autism said...

Vaccines Cause Micro-Vascular Strokes:

http://newsblaze.com/story/20080927170755tsop.nb/topstory.html

http://www.brainguardmd.com/pdf/massevidence.pdf

Love, Gabby. :0)

John H said...

Here is another Gardasil victim speaking out Barbara.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/videos/detail/ashley-story/

Notice ALL the pharmaceuticals this girl NOW MUST HAVE. Yes, Gardasil IS a smashing success.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Barbara. As always I lok forward to your informed comments.

lionmage said...

Hi there. I'm new to your blog, but I was doing a Google search on something I had never heard of before (the practice of parents being made to sign a moral doubt waiver before administering Gardasil to their kids) and I found your blog, specifically this entry.

I'm sort of conflicted here. While I don't share your passionate distrust of and enmity toward the medical establishment, I do understand where you're coming from. I personally doubt the link between vaccines and autistic spectrum disorders -- and I'm saying this as someone who was recently diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome -- but I've always been open to the possibility, and I am constantly reading new information and revising my opinions.

But we're talking about Gardasil here. I'm shocked at the severity of some of the reactions to the vaccine. In the past, when doctors spoke of adverse reactions to vaccines, they were typically pretty mild reactions. Even the statistically rare reactions weren't usually life threatening, although there's always the possibility of a severe allergic reaction to whatever was used to make the vaccine. People who have egg allergies aren't supposed to have flu vaccines, right? But some of the reactions to this new vaccine are truly frightening and of a whole different order of magnitude.

It's a numbers game in the end, but you have to ask, if the reactions of even a few patients are severe enough to lead to death, is that really acceptable risk? I'm not sure I have the answer. A rare (say, 1 in 100,000) chance of an adverse reaction isn't so big a deal if the reaction is coming down with flu-like symptoms for a day. It's a much bigger deal if the reaction is something like, say, permanent paralysis of some part of your body.

One thing I did want to mention, though, is the comparison of Gardasil to Menactra. This isn't a perfect apples-to-apples comparison. For starters, you mention that Menactra is administered as a single shot series, whereas Gardasil is administered as a 3-shot series. Granted, I was not a bio major in college, but I remember enough to know a few basic things about the immune system. In order to develop an allergic reaction to something, you have to be exposed to the allergen at least once. Typically, the first exposure to something isn't what causes severe allergic reactions. So it seems to me that the dosing regimen difference will contribute to the different rates of adverse reactions between these two vaccines; comparing the two is thus suspect (from a methodological perspective), and statistically questionable. How much of a contribution does the dosing regimen difference make to these different rates? That requires research, but can't just be ignored by either side in this debate.

Lest you think I'm trying to be a cheerleader for big pharma or mandatory vaccination, let me share a horror story with you. I was an undergrad at MIT, which has to follow Massachusetts law regarding vaccinations. Apparently, the MIT health department felt that my vaccinations were not in order, because every 6 months to a year they would send a nasty letter home to my parents saying that I was missing a required vaccination. Every year, my mother would send them a copy of my vaccination records and tell them that I had all my required vaccinations. Lather, rinse, repeat.

My senior year, I finally got fed up enough with this badgering that I called the powers that be from my dorm room and left a nasty, verbally abusive message. This one actually got me results -- they'd blown us off every other time I tried to contact them, but this time they actually called me.

Apparently, one of my vaccines was administered too young, according to Massachusetts law and MIT policy, so it didn't count. Because of a purely bureaucratic requirement, I had no choice but to go back to my family doctor and get a mumps vaccine. (It was for sure either mumps or measles, and I am willing to stake money that it was the mumps vaccine I wound up having to get.)

They also threatened to not allow me to graduate, to withhold my degree. They also then threatened to bring formal action against me through my academic adviser because I left an irate message, though that was largely an empty threat. I was more worried about going through 4 years of anguish and not having anything to show for it.

So I got the mumps vaccine ... and within 24 hours had a fever. Not thinking it was a big deal, I let it go... and got rather ill, coughing up brown phlegm (usually a sign of old blood in the lungs). Mind you, I was not a smoker at the time, at all. It took me about a week to get over the illness.

I never did prove conclusively that it was the vaccine, but it did seem awfully coincidental. Furthermore, the idiocy of the exercise is not in dispute. If I had been a carrier for any disease, taking a vaccine scant months before graduation wouldn't prevent me from transmitting that disease to any other students in the preceding three and a half years! Similarly, if not having the vaccine were really a big deal, I would have been susceptible to infection the entire time I was there. So the only reason to force me to comply with the regulation was a bureaucratic one, not a true medical reason.

Granted, not as big a deal as some unfortunates out there... although I am considering getting a fertility test just to be sure I'm "all there" after the mumps vaccine.

Sorry for the length of this. Part of me wonders if you'll approve my comment at all, though I sincerely hope you'll at least read it and consider what I've said.

Schwartz said...

Barbara,

This discussion is quite pertinent. I think you could also add the following to your evidence:

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/08/15/nejm-editors-enter-supreme-court-fray-over-drug-risks/?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/NEJM_Editors_Amicus.pdf

Although they didn't describe vaccines, the following is just as applicable, if not more so:

"Lawsuits, she told the Health Blog, are now the only deterrent against misbehavior by drug companies because the FDA isn’t a reliable gatekeeper. “The FDA has been given over to the industry it regulates,” Angell said. Companies are “putting drugs on the market with insufficient evidence of safety, and keeping them there even where clear evidence of risk emerges — and the FDA has not take decisive or fast action.”"

A quote directly from the brief:

"In arguing that immunity from failure-to warn suits should uniquely be provided to their industry, they fail to consider that the tort system has played a crucial role in assisting the FDA in evaluating the benefits and risks of prescription drugs. As the examples of Pondimin/Redux, Vioxx, and Trasylol potently demonstrate, the FDA alone simply lacks the ability to serve as the sole guarantor of drug safety. Without the tort system, the FDA would be stripped of an essential source of information that the agency has consistently relied on when making its regulatory decisions, and the American public would be deprived of a vital deterrent against pharmaceutical company misconduct. Thus, rather than promote public health, the preemption of failure-to-warn claims would substantially threaten it. Amici therefore urge this Court to reject Petitioner’s request for preemption."

Anonymous said...

John H.

Are you angry because most people think that you are an idiot?

Anonymous said...

It's important that we report any side effects from the Gardasil vaccine. Here are a view places to report Gardasil side effects.

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) – A government program for vaccine safety, co-sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

https://secure.vaers.org/VaersDataEntryintro.htm


RateADrug.com – Quick 5 minute, anonymous Gardasil survey. RateADrug is a community site for sharing experiences and learning about risks and benefits of prescription medications and alternative treatments. Post comments and view other people's experiences with Gardasil.

http://www.rateadrug.com/Gardasil-Human-Papillomavirus-Vaccine-side-effects.aspx


National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) – Longer, more in depth questionnaire. This is a non-profit organization that advocates vaccine safety and preventing vaccine injury through education.

http://www.nvic.org/Vaccines-and-Diseases/hpv.aspx

John H said...

Yet another Gardasil horror story.

http://www.kake.com/health/headlines/39520342.html

Teenagers are NOT infants and can tell us point blank... "THE VACCINE IS KILLING ME."

It doesn't matter to big government which IS big Pharma who keeps telling us... "Just keep your mouths shut and take it!"


So to Anonymous...

You're Damn right Jack, I'm mad as hell. You need to get a clue. MOST PEOPLE are waking up to vaccines whether YOU like it or not and, are also getting JUST AS mad as hell.

It's idiots like YOU who want us to simply keep our mouths shut, and take your deadly vaccines.

It's NOT going to happen.

Kimn said...

Barbara, thank you for taking time to write so directly about this serious matter. I've noticed this pattern of advertising/pushing the "latest and greatest" vaccine/medication, only to see legal announcements within two years of release warning of dangerous health problems or even death caused by these same miracle medicines!

And like John, I, too, ran into the same brainless vaccination requirement at the University of Iowa. I returned to college three years ago as an older adult student. They hassled me regularly my first semester about my MMR records, although I don't live on campus and am in my 40s. They then formally notified me that they would block my ability to register for the next semester if I did not provide proof of my MMR vaccinations or come into their on-campus clinic to get the MMR. It didn't matter that I got those shots so long ago those records no longer exist, nor that I actually HAD both measles and mumps when I was little (meaning I have natural immunity!).

Fortunately, in my state, I was able to fill out a religious objection form when I learned that the MMR vaccine was developed and continues to be made from the genetic family of cells obtained from an aborted baby in the 1960s. So I took the religious objection (which was true for me)--but it's upsetting that we cannot refuse vaccines on the basis of personal objection.

Our personal freedom over our own bodies is frighteningly near extinction. And big pharma is driven by profits, while government agencies look the other way so they can benefit from campaign donations, I suspect. Thank you, Barbara, for tackling this terribly important topic and informing us with details.

John H said...

Kimn said...
"I, too, ran into the same brainless vaccination requirement at the University of Iowa. I returned to college three years ago as an older adult student. They hassled me regularly my first semester about my MMR records, although I don't live on campus and am in my 40s. They then formally notified me that they would block my ability to register for the next semester if I did not provide proof of my MMR vaccinations or come into their on-campus clinic to get the MMR."

Kimn, this is out right EXTORTION.

There is NO law demanding you take a deadly vaccine. Government and institutions use 'color of law' as a way to 'FORCE' deadly vaccines on you.

We should NOT even have to sign wavers. There is NO law of 'force'.

As 'consumers' of health care (the medical industrial complex) simply say NO to vaccines we will back these goons off.

...and when they ask why? Simply tell them... "because NO means NO.

Anonymous said...

The FDA and Government turn the other way because Big Pharma actually makes more money then the Government collects in Taxes.

Stem Cell for Autism said...

It is amazing Spain has banned Gardisil and we are still endorsing it!!!

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/02/24/Spain-Withdraws-Gardasil-After-Illnesses.aspx


Love, Gabby. :0)
http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/

"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport

Loving Truth said...

As a medical research journalist in the Netherlands I have just published a book on the HPV vaccines scam. I hope to have its Dutch version translated into English asap!
BAARMOEDERHALSKANKER - de HPV-vaccins als een ‘deus ex vagina’,
ISBN 978.90.202.03271 (Cervical cancer, the HPV vaccines as a lighting from heaven),
www.ankh-hermes.nl

Anonymous said...

Barbara:
The last segment of your artical about really takes away from your argument. You know that it was only that the people thought Marie Antoinette said "Let them eat cake," right? This means you are using an example of public ignorance right when you are saying we, the public, need to take a stand. Wanna edit that last paragraph? Because everything else you're saying, I totally agree with.

Anonymous said...

This is the word from the CDC site about gardasil:
"Studies have found no serious side effects"

I ASK WHY AM I FUNDING THIS INFO WITH MY HARD EARNED TAX DOLLARS!?!?!?!?!? GOD SAVE MY DAUGHTERS.

Anonymous said...

Barbara,
The reason Merck can get away with killing and injury is because there is no Law. Federal or State Law. No Product Liability for Prescription drugs. Gardasil is a prescription drug and there is no remedy for anyone who s injured or killed with a defective prescription drug. Merck is above the law. in 1962 Congress omitted Product Liability from the FDCA ACT, for Prescription drugs and Medical Devises. This provided a protected Shield for prescription drug manufacturing companies. No Law to prosecute for damages or killing. Show me the Law. There is None.Merck is the largest vaccine producing Company in the world, They control the news media and the legal system. I know I am a Vioxx Survivor.

Anonymous said...

Knowledge is power. Please take a few minutes and watch this important video on the potential dangers --and limited benefits--of the Gardasil vaccine and consider sharing it with others. Over 30 girls have already died after getting it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msoyRYSoSJk

Please share this with anyone you know who may be considering the vaccine for their daughters or themselves.

Thank you so much!

Anonymous said...

If someone could answer my question ASAP!Today I got the first Gardasil shot because my mom insisted. I was telling my mother and my doctor about the things I've researched about the serious consequences and deaths linked to this vaccine. My doctor clearly stated "There have been NO deaths by this vaccine"

Clearly he was wrong. He basically pressured my mother into making me get this vaccine.

So my question is since I already got the first vaccine, should I refuse to get the second and third one. I'm hoping it will reduce my chance of getting serious complications. I'm 15 and I know I don't have much of a say in things. But I do have a say in how long I want to live. And I certainly dont want to delay it because of a vaccine.


Please help me,

-Bree

Stem Cell for Autism said...

Dear Bree:
By all means do not put an other shot of GARDISIL again and consider DETOXING for the first one too!!!

Love, Gabby. :0)http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/

"I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin." ~ Jerry Newport

Teri said...

Barbara, this is so frightening to read! I have a 13 year old daughter who has now had TWO shots... from two different doctors (due to moving out of our area) and the doctors were very pushy, both of them and acted like I was being an abusive or bad parent and doing my daughter an injustice if I didn't get her this vaccine. I don't know if there are other parents out there who have felt this pressure... but I felt very nervous about the second shot and this Doctor did everything in her power to reassure me that the internet comments and articles are not correct. Also that I am being a bit over-reactive for reading them. Please help me and the other Anonymous 15 year old girl who wrote you too (that says she had one shot already.. this is HER body and she should have a say in this!) Does this vaccine effect the body over time, or would the reaction happen right away???

Would she have shown signs by now? It's been about 5 months since her last shot. Any direction on where to go for information? Thank you for your candor and your article. Any other information would be of great help!

Pascale Desjardins - 21 said...

I know this blog post is old, but I felt the need to add this one fact. GARDASIL is now required for all women of the right age group who want to immigrate legally to the United States (not an easy, or cheap, thing to do!). I met my one true love in this country and we are both scared as hell of me being FORCED to take this vaccine (especially since I would be coming in this country as a WIFE, rendering the vaccine completely useless since I am faithfull; I would risk my life for nothing.)... So he'll probably move in my country: Canada.

Danielle said...

Hi there,

I am a sixteen year old who's family, especialy the female side, has a history of cancer (including cervical cancer). I have had the vaccine, and am fine. For some people, such as myself, the risk of getting cancer is higher, and therefore the vaccine was a good thing. Yes the vaccine does cause severe reactions in some, but so do many other vaccines and medications, but it's just not as publizied. You should talk to your doctor if to find out the pros and cons, and ask him about his opinion, and his patients reactions on the vaccine.

Susan the Pharmacist said...

Vioxx survivor: There is no federal law for prescription medications???
I think the media is blowing this way out of proportion. If you actually learn to look at statistics and understand if they are worthy of conclusion then you can further evaluate. You do have a choice. But with this vaccine there is no "statistical" proven link between the vaccine and the deaths that have occured. Most of the deaths have been linked to other illness/disease unrealted to the vaccine. Please make an educated decision by using resources that are reliable instead of resources that are just to glorify their latest news story. And as a side note: my daughter is vaccinated and she is doing just fine.
www.cdc.org
www.fda.gov

Searching still said...

I guess you could say that I am in the same boat. My daughter, 14 at the time of the vaccine on June9,2009, became ill within 30 minutes of the vaccine. She was in bed for the first 4 days with high fever, severe abdominal cramps, body aches, migrains, vomiting, diarrhea and numbness in her shoulder. Most of the problems subsided, (thank God!) but she has never stopped vomiting and still has severe abdominal pains (It has now been 3 months and she still vomits every day!) I was told that the ONLY possible side effect was a rash at the injection site! Even after she got sick, they (the doctors office) still insisted that is wasn't possible for it to be the vaccine! Ours is a little different story...and a little ironic. During our first ER visit, Ashlee was diagnosed with PID (pelvic inflammatory disease) this is a disease caused from either gannarhia or chlamydia. She is a virgin. I was talked into a vaccine to protect my baby from sexually transmitted diseases, and it GIVES her a disease that it was supose to protect her from. I finally found a website where they did the studies, and there were 5 other girls that got PID from the shot. (only 5 in 250,000, so lets not add it to the possible side effects) I printed it out and brought it to my daughter's PCP. She STILL would not believe that she got this from the vaccine, even though the DNA testing proved that she showed negative for the STD's that they said caused this!

WHAT THE HECK?????
Are the doctor's getting a kick back or what? "Here is the proof in black and white, I spoke to a representitive at Merck that confirmed it, and you still want to look me in the face and say, No, it was NOT the vaccine!"
And yes, I did switch physicians immediatly!
Once Ashlee got sick I became TRULY informed...and I guess that we are lucky. She may become infertal, she is now high risk for tubal pregnancies, we still haven't found out why she vomits every day,we have had many hospital stays and every test they can think of including a colonoscopy (she wasn't too fond of that) she has learned at a very young age about how a woman has to lose her dignity. I am a single mom and have missed so much work, so it has been a huge financial burden as well. But she IS alive and she can walk. So I am doing everything in my power to be grateful!!! I wish I could find the others that have suffered this rare side effect to see how long it has lasted for them, and if we will ever have a light at the end of this tunnel. If you know any of these girls, please email me! I am desparate to give her an answer!
lareeesmith@yahoo.com. Thank you.

Karen said...

The tragedy is that we believe the US has the best medical system in the world. The US knows so little about the immune system. If you want answers ....Dr. Thomas Rau at the Paracelsus Clinic in Switzerland is a good place to start. Anyone ever stop to wonder why no one in the US connects oral health to systemic health? The ADA would have a stroke if we figured it out. My answer to the vaccines........... those who falsely misled should be considered criminals and face the punishments like other criminals.........oh, and make sure they are given many doses of their vaccine!

Dr. M. Srinivas said...

I am Dr.M.Srinivas from India: about 15th March, 2010, there have been four deaths reported from KHAMMAM dt, in A.P. state of India, following a mass vaccination with Gardasil vaccine. I wish you look into the details of it, in THE HINDU newspapers for the last one week.

Sandlin said...

Don't take ANY vaccines! Personally, I have a neurological disorder that I trace directly back to a sugar-cube, polio vaccine that I was forced to take while in the military. Of course, everyone denies there's any link, but I started showing neurological symptoms immediately after the does. I've had this problem for a lifetime. The "experts" can deny the link all they like, but I know the cause-the sugar-cube vaccine.
We are all guinea-pigs. And now that the guinea pigs are wising up, they now want to pass laws and force their toxic brew on all of us. Just say NO. Your best defense is a healthy immune system. Many hospital workers, despite their brain-washing, know this and that's why they refuse to take vaccines.

repete said...

Barbara, have you ever looked into suicide and Gardasil? Myy 12 year old daughter had her second course of the vaccine, and she hung herself in her closet two months later. Her name was Jasmyn Kathleen Nelson and you can search her name for her obituary for verfication if you desire. I am looking for answers to her death, because we are completely stunned that she did that and the police, coroner, her friends, and our family have no answers. Please help, even if what you find is infinitesimal.

Anonymous said...

I had gardasil and had no problem with it. And I remember seeing Jasmyn's obituary in the Standard Examiner. I haven't heard of it being related to suicide, I hope you find your answer soon.

khairul044 said...

The last segment of your artical about really takes away from your argument.